| User | Post |
|
12:50 am August 2, 2008
| Carolena
Member
| | Birch Run, MI | |
|
| posts 42 |
|
|
How do you feel about singing within a piece…?
|
She said one day, one day, one too many days. Now she ducked and she ran away. Never to be heard from, never to be seen. I check the cover of a magazine I’m just wondering how, just wondering how.*
|
|
|
8:59 am August 2, 2008
| LovelyLilKate
Nerd
| | Jefferson County, TN | |
|
| posts 171 |
|
|
If the piece calls for singing, go for it. If your piece has a song in it–a mother rocking her child to sleep, a famous musician, etc–heck yeah I think it's called for. But if your piece is about a mute girl, I doubt she'll sing. What I'm saying is don't add singing just because you want to show off a voice; it needs to relate to the piece you're performing.
|
Being happy doesn’t mean that everything’s perfect; it just means you’ve decided to see beyond the imperfections.
|
|
|
2:11 pm August 2, 2008
| blackbooklove
Member
| | Alpharetta, GA | |
|
| posts 25 |
|
|
I believe most states/districts/leagues have a rule against singing for more than 30 seconds, and I am a firm believer in this rule. I also think that the singing needs to be a part of the piece, not just something added in to showcase someone's voice.Like the previous poster mentioned, if the piece is about a musician, I say go for it.
However, here are some of my pet peeves when it comes to singing in pieces:
-Songs used as transitions between sections of a piece that have nothing to do with the storyline. This is seen a lot in duos and OI.
-You are not Kristin Chenoweth. You are not Ethel Merman. You are not Raul Esparza. You are not Patti LuPone. And, you are not Norbert Leo Butz. Therefore, you have no right to randomly burst out in song for no reason. I don't care if you can hit C above staff without even warming up first. If you start singing “At Last” in the middle of “The Lovely Bones”, there's a problem.
-When doing a B'way, Off-B'way, Off-Off-B'way, Regional Theater, or made-for-TV musical, it isn't always necessary to sing the main song from said musical. My biggest one with this is Little Shop of Horrors. You'll probably hear me rant about this a lot on various threads, but, for the love of suits and warm-ups, DO NOT sing “Little Shop of Horrors” as your teaser. Or as your intro. Or as any other part of your piece. The song does not contribute to the plot. It's a waste of time, and I have yet to hear a rendition of it that does not make me want to stick pencils in my ears.
-Also with musicals, if you feel as though you can not possibly perform “Legally Blonde: The Musical: The Speech Piece” without singing “Omigod You Guys” or, if, in your heart of hearts, you know that “Rent…the Duo!” is not complete unless you belt out the high note from “Seasons of Love”, know the melody. Know the words. And, please, please, please, please, keep it under 30 seconds. If we want to hear “Memory” for three minutes, we'll buy the cast recording. (Not that anyone would *want* to listen to “Memory”, but still.)
That having been said (ranted), I have sung in a speech piece before. It was an oratory. About Broadway. But, I kept it under thirty seconds, and I made sure it related to my speech. Singing in 4n6 can be very risky. A lot of judges don't like it, so if you're going to risk your rankings to sing out, Louise, make sure you're doing it for the right reasons.
/rant…really.
|
Spin it. Let’s begin it. Bear and grin it. When you’re in it. You can win it. In ten minutes. When you. Spin it. Spin it. Spin it.
|
|
|
2:42 pm August 2, 2008
| Ray Nesrym
Nerd
| | | |
|
| posts 249 |
|
|
It depends ont he amount of singing and teh purpose. I would say as a rule of thumb you should never sing for more than 15 seconds if you can help it. I personally try to only to use music for comedic affect, I think when you try to make it serious or dramatic it generally doesn't work regardless of your singing abilities (it can work but almost everytime I hear someone try it, it doesn't sound believable).
If you still want to go for it remember, just cause you're singing doesn't mean you don't have to worry about your character I think part of my problem with people singing, is that most people focus on singing well, and completely lose their characters, you have to sing while still incharacter, that usually means singin ina differnt voive than you usually sing in please if you're goignto try singng for dramatic effeect remember that! Other wise instead of adding to your piece the singing can make it harder to believe.
oh and one last piece of advice. I know this sounds cruel and mean but it could save your piece here it goes.
If you can't sing DON'T!
|
I have bad typing, deal with it .
|
|
|
2:52 pm August 2, 2008
| oHIo
Nerd
| | Northeast Ohio | |
|
| posts 103 |
|
|
blackbooklove said:
I believe most states/districts/leagues have a rule against singing for more than 30 seconds, and I am a firm believer in this rule. I also think that the singing needs to be a part of the piece, not just something added in to showcase someone's voice.Like the previous poster mentioned, if the piece is about a musician, I say go for it.
-Songs used as transitions between sections of a piece that have nothing to do with the storyline. This is seen a lot in duos and OI.
-You are not Kristin Chenoweth. You are not Ethel Merman. You are not Raul Esparza. You are not Patti LuPone. And, you are not Norbert Leo Butz. Therefore, you have no right to randomly burst out in song for no reason. I don't care if you can hit C above staff without even warming up first. If you start singing “At Last” in the middle of “The Lovely Bones”, there's a problem.
Okay, I've quoted the stuff I want to comment on. First of all, the 30 second rule is (afaik) not a state rule in most areas. The 30 second singing rule is a rule in CFLs but not in NFLs at all.
Most people who have singing in their pieces do not just randomly do it to showcase their voice to the audiences. In examples I've seen, it's been used very tastefully. Take, for example, the Wizard of Oz in Duo which took 2nd place this year at NFLs. They were able to have singing transitions that were a.) funny and b.) relevant to the plot. They were actually functional.
As far as the “You are not Kristin Chenoweth” comment. Who ever said that the singing had to be good? I've seen excellent examples in DI where the person sang badly and it ended up being very powerful.
I think we all can agree though that excessive singing can not only be annoying, but it can hurt the piece and the message the performers are trying to convey.
|
“Do it to do it again” – Anonymous
|
|
|
3:08 pm August 2, 2008
| blackbooklove
Member
| | Alpharetta, GA | |
|
| posts 25 |
|
|
oHIo said:
blackbooklove said:
I believe most states/districts/leagues have a rule against singing for more than 30 seconds, and I am a firm believer in this rule. I also think that the singing needs to be a part of the piece, not just something added in to showcase someone's voice.Like the previous poster mentioned, if the piece is about a musician, I say go for it.
-Songs used as transitions between sections of a piece that have nothing to do with the storyline. This is seen a lot in duos and OI.
-You are not Kristin Chenoweth. You are not Ethel Merman. You are not Raul Esparza. You are not Patti LuPone. And, you are not Norbert Leo Butz. Therefore, you have no right to randomly burst out in song for no reason. I don't care if you can hit C above staff without even warming up first. If you start singing “At Last” in the middle of “The Lovely Bones”, there's a problem.
Okay, I've quoted the stuff I want to comment on. First of all, the 30 second rule is (afaik) not a state rule in most areas. The 30 second singing rule is a rule in CFLs but not in NFLs at all.
Most people who have singing in their pieces do not just randomly do it to showcase their voice to the audiences. In examples I've seen, it's been used very tastefully. Take, for example, the Wizard of Oz in Duo which took 2nd place this year at NFLs. They were able to have singing transitions that were a.) funny and b.) relevant to the plot. They were actually functional.
As far as the “You are not Kristin Chenoweth” comment. Who ever said that the singing had to be good? I've seen excellent examples in DI where the person sang badly and it ended up being very powerful.
I think we all can agree though that excessive singing can not only be annoying, but it can hurt the piece and the message the performers are trying to convey.
I was almost positive it was an NFL rule. It's been on the top of nearly every single ballot I've ever received in multiple events. *Checks file of every ballot she's ever gotten, because she's lame and keeps all of them in her room*… “Scenes from musicals are acceptable, provided that the singing be limited to a maximum of thirty seconds total within the presentation.” Every other ballot I had with guidelines included a similar statement.
I didn't say nobody should ever sing ever, I merely pointed out that if you are going to sing you should have a reason to do so, and it should be in some way, shape or form related to the piece. As for the Wizard of Oz piece you mentioned, their singing was obviously related to the piece and therefore not uncalled for, making it a good addition to the performance.
The Kristin Chenoweth comment was pointed at people who only sing in pieces to prove that they can. Again…”I don't care if you can hit C above staff without even warming up first. If you start singing “At Last” in the middle of “The Lovely Bones”, there's a problem.”
|
Spin it. Let’s begin it. Bear and grin it. When you’re in it. You can win it. In ten minutes. When you. Spin it. Spin it. Spin it.
|
|
|
6:53 pm August 2, 2008
| Jeska
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 28 |
|
|
Ray Nesrym said:
If you still want to go for it remember, just cause you’re singing doesn’t mean you don’t have to worry about your character I think part of my problem with people singing, is that most people focus on singing well, and completely lose their characters, you have to sing while still incharacter, that usually means singin ina differnt voive than you usually sing in please if you’re goignto try singng for dramatic effeect remember that! Other wise instead of adding to your piece the singing can make it harder to believe.
Absolutely!!! That’s my issue with singing as well. I judged a DI at NFLs this summer where the girl had a LOVELY voice, and it did make contextual sense for her to break into song for effect at one point, but I had a really hard time believing that her character would be able to sing that well. Not to mention the accent she had used for the rest of the piece mysteriously dissapeared at this point. I’m all for a little bit of singing if the piece calls for it contextually, but the performance of the song has to match the character you are portraying as well as the emotions that would follow… For instance, a piece that I once saw (”Blue,” I believe its called. I may be wrong, don’t quote me on it) established early on that the main character (the mother) loves to sing “You are my sunshine” to her baby. The baby dies in the end (yay DI!) and she sings to the dead baby… This can be a beautiful moment if the song is executed correctly – quiet, heartfelt, perhaps a break or two in the voice… but if the performer is concentrating on the actual singing rather than the acting going on behind it, its nowhere near as effective, and kind of awkard.
|
|
|
7:55 pm August 2, 2008
| Cpt. Planet
Member
| | Imaginationland | |
|
| posts 69 |
|
|
Jeska said:
Ray Nesrym said:
If you still want to go for it remember, just cause you’re singing doesn’t mean you don’t have to worry about your character I think part of my problem with people singing, is that most people focus on singing well, and completely lose their characters, you have to sing while still incharacter, that usually means singin ina differnt voive than you usually sing in please if you’re goignto try singng for dramatic effeect remember that! Other wise instead of adding to your piece the singing can make it harder to believe.
Absolutely!!! That’s my issue with singing as well. I judged a DI at NFLs this summer where the girl had a LOVELY voice, and it did make contextual sense for her to break into song for effect at one point, but I had a really hard time believing that her character would be able to sing that well. Not to mention the accent she had used for the rest of the piece mysteriously dissapeared at this point. I’m all for a little bit of singing if the piece calls for it contextually, but the performance of the song has to match the character you are portraying as well as the emotions that would follow… For instance, a piece that I once saw (”Blue,” I believe its called. I may be wrong, don’t quote me on it) established early on that the main character (the mother) loves to sing “You are my sunshine” to her baby. The baby dies in the end (yay DI!) and she sings to the dead baby… This can be a beautiful moment if the song is executed correctly – quiet, heartfelt, perhaps a break or two in the voice… but if the performer is concentrating on the actual singing rather than the acting going on behind it, its nowhere near as effective, and kind of awkard.
Quoted for emphasis.
|
AARP is the sound an old man makes when trying to get out of a beanbag chair
|
|
|
9:59 pm August 2, 2008
| LovelyLilKate
Nerd
| | Jefferson County, TN | |
|
| posts 171 |
|
|
Jeska said:
This can be a beautiful moment if the song is executed correctly – quiet, heartfelt, perhaps a break or two in the voice… but if the performer is concentrating on the actual singing rather than the acting going on behind it, its nowhere near as effective, and kind of awkard.
Agreed. It needs to be in-character, even if that means singing out of tune or off-melody. Fit the piece.
Good discussion, and a great thread to start.
|
Being happy doesn’t mean that everything’s perfect; it just means you’ve decided to see beyond the imperfections.
|
|
|
1:33 pm August 3, 2008
| Chewie
Member
| | | |
|
| posts 13 |
|
|
Don't force it. And if you don't know if it feels forced or not, then don't risk it. Unless it seems very natural to you as a performer, it won't come off that way to the audience.
|
|
|
7:57 pm August 6, 2008
| Temple
Member
| | Ohio University | |
|
| posts 52 |
|
|
Don't sing. For anyone who saw my duo (few), my partner and I made fun of the dramatic duos that sing by having Matt hum “Amazing Grace” while I talked about the true meaning of Christmas (Xbox, GTA3, and hookers included). I understand it's powerful at points. It's corny at more. At least wait 2 years if you're just starting out. My “don't sing” when I started this was meant for first timers, and those not yet acclimated. Singing… I'm not a fan of. Not in speech. I like realism in DIs and dramatic Duos, and my reality doesn't burst into song.
And I liked Rachel Kenny's “Little Shop of Horrors.” Just for the record.
|
Now that’s the problem with open immigration
|
|
|
3:14 pm August 8, 2008
| GFan
Nerd
| | South Carolina | |
|
| posts 169 |
|
|
Temple said:
And I liked Rachel Kenny's “Little Shop of Horrors.” Just for the record.
Off-topic, but I LOVED her version of “Little Shop of Horrors” too. Hit her my 4th round at Wake and was just amazed.
Anywho, I sang in my oratory er, last year (as in.. the 07-08 season) and it did very well. There isn't an NFL rule saying you can't sing and I don't think it really matters. Singing, to me, can be a hit-or-miss thing. You've got to have the heart, the soul, and the emotion to really deliver a vocal and make it inspirational or powerful for the performance. If you're missing that, then it just doesn't work out.
I'm planning on adding a little musical bit into my HI just because I love singing, and I think it could add to the character. I'm not saying make a random character sing in every piece, but it's just one of those “things” that you can do to add a little bit of detail to your piece. (Humming, whistling, etc.)
I would say not to force musicality in your piece, but if it CAN fit and can link scenes or something together, then go for it. It's just all based on the piece, and whether you think it will connect with the audience or not.
|
Give up on yourself and you give up on the world. The world ends with you!
|
|
|
6:25 pm September 12, 2008
| The Alex
Member
| | Texas! | |
|
| posts 42 |
|
|
This guy made it to finals at NFL nats in DI and he sang. It was about this guy who accidentally ran over his sister and killed her. It was really cool, The singing was the radio in his car, and he would pop between the main character who was recalling the events and the radio singer. It was incredible. Can't remember the name of the guy, or the piece he did, but it was probably the best DI I'd ever seen.
Edit: Found the piece, it's Nocturne by Adam Rapp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to agree and say that singing can definitely be powerful at certain points, funny at others, and completely brutal at others. There are some people who simply know how to execute it without sounding contrived or like their trying too hard to be funny or emotional. It definitely takes a strong performer (like “The Wizard of Oz” duo of last year and Rachel Kenney's “Little Shop”) to pull it off. But little incidental things like humming or whistling really aren't so distracting as transitions unless their just simply beaten to death ad nauseum.
|
NSF ‘08 – David & Gabe’s Lab (A-Team, re-pre-sent!)
|
|
|
3:44 pm October 1, 2008
| Temple
Member
| | Ohio University | |
|
| posts 52 |
|
|
Another problem I'm seeing is that only one of the categories- Duo, obviously- has more than one person performing. This means that whoever is singing no longer has the ability to be acting. Duos use it for transitions, background, etc. But I think the more important thing in DIs especially is the acting. I don't remember any of the national finalists the last 2 years sing that much. I could be wrong, but nothing I liked or remember comes to mind.
|
Now that’s the problem with open immigration
|
|
|
6:18 pm October 1, 2008
| The Alex
Member
| | Texas! | |
|
| posts 42 |
|
|
Ooh I just remembered.
Nathan Rarick sang in his HI of Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone which he got 2nd at Nats with.
He basically sang the words to the tune of Phantom of the Opera, and it was amazing =]
|
|
|
|
|
11:52 pm October 1, 2008
| Temple
Member
| | Ohio University | |
|
| posts 52 |
|
|
Considering HI is a category in which character development and meaning are often replaced with humor value, this didn't surprise me one bit. However, when something is being used for dramatic intent- something HIs notoriously, and by name, have little to none of, it's useless except in very rare surcumstances. I choose to not like the pieces that make those rare occurances less spectacular by tarnishing the event with pointless musical jargon.
|
Now that’s the problem with open immigration
|
|
|
12:27 pm March 15, 2009
| Jeska
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 28 |
|
|
I've been wary of if not against singing in pieces for a LOOOONG time but I finally “got it” this weekend. I'm sitting with my team waiting for an awards ceremony, and I don't know how it got started, but we sat there and sang all of the songs from DI and Duo finals at Harvard this year… and it occured to me that they REALLY stick with you! Frankly I'm a little bit embarrassed that it took me almost seven full years of forensics to figure this out, but my goodness is it a good strategy for memorability!
|
|